Hagens Berman represents Blue Cross Blue Shield Association and Government Employees Health Association and is part of the plaintiffs’ steering committee in this lawsuit that alleges Jazz Pharmaceuticals Inc. engaged in anticompetitive behavior with the intention of impairing and delaying generic competition for its brand drug Xyrem (sodium oxybate).

Case Status
Settled
Class Certified
Settlement Value
$195 Million
Case Caption
Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association v. Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Position
Plaintiffs' Steering Committee
Court
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
Case Number
5:20-MD-02966-LHK
Defendant(S)
Jazz Pharmaceuticals Inc.
File Date

ABOUT THE XYREM LAWSUIT

The complaint asserts that Jazz filed suits against drug manufacturers who filed applications with the FDA to sell generic versions of Xyrem in order to maintain its exclusivity in the market. Jazz also allegedly entered into reverse-payment agreements with these would-be manufacturers, which compelled them to delay the entry of their generics from January 2018 to July 2023.

According to the complaint, Jazz’s final attempt to deter potential competitors took advantage of Xyrem’s restricted distribution. Because the drug is made from a sodium salt of gamma-hydroxybutrate (GHB), which is a commonly known as a date-rape drug, the approval of Xyrem and any generic equivalents requires a risk management system in order to deter abuse.

Jazz implemented a patented distribution plan that operated through a single pharmacy as part of this system with the alleged objective of frustrating potential generic manufacturers’ efforts to obtain approval for their generics.

The complaint identifies further allegations against Jazz related to its efforts to delay generic entry; Jazz prosecuted multiple frivolous citizen petitions before the FDA, allegedly in an effort to delay approval of the generics. The complaint also asserts that Jazz engaged in a product-hop, in which it filed a new drug application for a follow-up drug in order to obtain another round of patent exclusivity and maintain market power.

TOP PHARMA LAW FIRM

Hagens Berman is one of the most successful litigation law firms in the U.S. taking on pharmaceutical companies and has achieved more than $320 billion in settlements against Big Pharma largest sellers and manufacturers for antitrust schemes, pay-for-delay, IP shams and other forms of wrongdoing that drive up the costs of prescription drugs for consumers and others.

CASE TIMELINE

10/27/25 | Judge Grants Final Approval to $195M Settlement

Chief U.S. District Judge Richard Seeborg granted final approval to a $195 million settlement in an order issued on Oct. 27, 2025. His 7-page order noted that no class member had opted out of nor objected to the settlement, reflecting, “that this relief is adequate and weighs in favor of approval.”

Judge Seeborg said of the settlement, “A forty-six percent recovery is comparable to or better than other settlement funds in antitrust class actions. …These recoveries are significant particularly when balanced against the risks and expenses of continuing litigation.” He also noted that this result achieved by Hagens Berman is the second largest recovery on behalf of end-payers in generic drug delay cases in federal court in the past two decades.

“Class Counsel have extensive antitrust and complex litigation experience, particularly in antitrust class actions involving pharmaceutical products, and they have pursued diligently Class Plaintiffs’ claims,” Seeborg wrote.

The order certifies a class consisting of all entities that paid and/or provided reimbursement for some or all of the purchase price for brand or generic Xyrem in Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Connecticut, District of Columbia, Florida, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kansas, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Oregon, Puerto Rico, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Utah, Vermont, West Virginia and Wisconsin, for consumption by their members, employees, insureds, participants or beneficiaries, and other than for resale, from Jan. 1, 2017, through the date the court entered an order granting preliminary approval.

Read the order »

Hagens Berman purchases advertisements on search engines, social media sites and other websites. Transmission of the information contained or available through this website is not intended to create, and receipt does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. If you seek legal advice or representation by Hagens Berman, you must first enter a formal agreement. All information contained in any transmission is confidential and Hagens Berman agrees to protect information against unauthorized use, publication or disclosure. This site is regulated by the Washington Rules of Professional Conduct.