Standard Life Insurance Company and Protective Life Insurance Company

Hagens Berman filed a class-action lawsuit against Standard Life Insurance Company and Protective Life Insurance Company alleging they violated California law by failing to provide mandated annual notices to their policyholders. Attorneys say that despite their failure to provide the legally mandated annual notices, Standard Life and Protective Life improperly lapsed life insurance policies and  wrongfully refused to pay the death benefits owed to beneficiaries after policyholders passed away.

ABOUT STANDARD LIFE AND PROTECTIVE LIFE INSURANCE POLICY LAPSES AND TERMINATIONS

In or around July 2001, Protective Life assumed the servicing of all individual life insurance policies issued by Standard Life, making the companies jointly responsible for these policies. Under California state law, life insurance companies such as Standard Life and Protective Life are required to give their policyholders an opportunity to designate a third party to receive notice of potential termination of benefits for non-payment of premiums. According to the lawsuit, this law provides a critical safeguard against people  losing their life insurance coverage, particularly seniors, who may be more likely to accidentally miss payments.

The lawsuit alleges Standard Life and Protective Life failed to provide policyholders with annual notice of their right to designate a third party, as mandated under California law. The complaint states that Standard Life and Protective Life “have set up two separate regulatory schemes to administer their life insurance policies,” choosing to disregard California law with respect to policies issued before Jan. 1, 2013 and adhering to it in the case of policies issued after Jan. 1, 2013.

According to the complaint, due to Standard Life and Protective Life’s alleged disregard for the law, a widow lost coverage under her late husband’s life insurance policies. The lawsuit states that at no time prior to terminating the policy did Standard Life and Protective Life provide the opportunity to designate a third party to receive notice of a pending termination. Standard Life and Protective Life then refused to pay the widow death benefits.

According to reports, at least 75% of American adults have some form of life insurance, and attorneys say that Standard Life and Protective Life have repeatedly and intentionally failed to fulfill their legal obligations to beneficiaries.

THE COST OF LIFE INSURANCE

According to the lawsuit, if a life insurance policyholder loses coverage and seeks reinstatement, they may have to undergo a new physical exam and be underwritten again, risking a significantly more expensive — possibly unaffordable — premium if their health has changed since they initially purchased their policy. The portions of the California Insurance Code which became effective Jan. 1, 2013 are intended to protect policyholders from this risk should they miss a premium payment, which attorneys say is not a mere hypothetical concern when one is ill or in the final stages of life.

Why was my loved one's life insurance policy lapsed or terminated by Standard Life and Protective Life?

According to attorneys, insureds’ life insurance policies may have lapsed or been terminated if they missed a premium payment. However, the lawsuit states, Standard Life and Protective Life and other insurance companies are required under California state law to provide policyholders with an annual opportunity to designate a third party to receive notice of potential termination of benefits for non-payment of premiums. If insurance companies fail to provide this notice and a form to provide the notice to California policyholders, as the lawsuit alleges Standard Life and Protective Life have, they are violating the law and may have improperly lapsed or terminated an insured’s life insurance policy.

What do I do if my deceased loved one's life insurance policy was lapsed or terminated for nonpayment of premium and I was denied death benefits?

Hagens Berman understands that maintaining coverage at a stable rate is of the utmost importance to life insurance policyholders, many of whom are on fixed incomes and rely on these policies to ensure care for their loved ones. Contact the firm to learn more about your rights against Standard Life and Protective Life for allegedly improperly lapsing or terminating life insurance policies.

How can a class action help with an improperly lapsed or terminated life insurance policy?

How can a class action help with an improperly lapsed or terminated life insurance policy?
Through a class-action lawsuit, individual consumers can collectively bring claims against powerful corporations that would otherwise have the upper hand, like Standard Life and Protective Life. A class-action lawsuit seeks to level the playing field, bringing strength to collective action to change corrupt practices and negligent responses to customers. Though these measures do not bring immediate relief, they are a time-tested method of holding companies accountable for wrongdoing, including improperly lapsed or terminated life insurance policies.

TOP CONSUMER RIGHTS LAW FIRM

Hagens Berman is one of the most successful consumer rights law firms in the U.S. and has bested some of the nation's largest corporations on behalf of those most vulnerable to corporate greed and negligence. The firm has secured more than $320 billion in settlements against insurance companies, pharmaceutical conglomerates and others, and our legal team is currently pursuing similar litigation against other life insurance providers. Your claims will be handled by attorneys experienced in insurance plan litigation.

NO COST TO YOU

In no case will any class member ever be asked to pay any out-of-pocket sum. In the event Hagens Berman or any other firm obtains a settlement that provides benefits to class members, the court will decide a reasonable fee to be awarded to the legal team for the class.