In April 2022, the court granted final approval to a $95 million settlement to resolve claims that Apple violated consumer laws by charging its customers premium prices for protection and replacement plans, known widely as AppleCare/AppleCare+. Consumers were allegedly led to believe that the program offered comparable replacement devices, but were instead given refurbished, lesser-valued products.

Case Status
Settled
Class Certified
Settlement Value
$95 Million
Case Caption
Maldonado v. Apple Inc., Applecare Service Company, Inc., And Apple CSC, Inc.
Position
Class Counsel
Court
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
Judge Assigned
Hon. William H. Orrick
Case Number
3:16-cv-04067
Defendant(S)
Apple Inc.
File Date

WHAT WAS THE LAWSUIT ABOUT?

An investigation revealed that Apple allegedly violated consumer laws, illegally charging customers premium prices for what they believed to be new replacement devices under its AppleCare/AppleCare+ programs. According to the lawsuit, those who purchased an iPhone or iPad along with AppleCare or AppleCare+ and made a claim for a new (or replacement) device likely did not receive what Apple promised. Device replacements were allegedly made with inferior, refurbished or used parts.

ABOUT THE ALLEGED FRAUD

When Apple sells iPhones, iPads and iPhones to the general public, it also offers protection plans known as AppleCare and AppleCare+ under which, if a consumer’s device breaks, Apple promises to provide the consumer with a device “equivalent to new in performance and reliability.” The protection plans purport to provide consumers with new devices, when in fact Apple sends consumers devices made of refurbished parts, failing to uphold its promise of iPhone and iPad replacements that are equivalent to new in performance and reliability.

The lawsuit sought reimbursement and restitution for consumers. Hagens Berman believes that those who paid premium prices for Apple's AppleCare plans (up to $129) and additional cost for device replacement (upwards of $99) should have received the new devices that Apple promised, not refurbished products passed off as adequate replacements.

CASE TIMELINE

Preliminary Approval Granted

U.S. District Judge William H. Orrick granted preliminary approval to a $95 million class-action settlement resolving consumer claims that Apple failed to honor its AppleCare warranties. Attorneys for the class estimate the settlement will cover between 3.5 and 4 million refurbished Apple devices.

Notices of the settlement will be emailed to class members starting Jan. 3, 2022. The final approval hearing is set for Apr. 27, 2022.

Full settlement details and deadlines can be found at replacementdevicelawsuit.com, including information regarding how to make a claim if you believe you are part of the class. Class members will also receive this information via emailed notice.

Hagens Berman purchases advertisements on search engines, social media sites and other websites. Transmission of the information contained or available through this website is not intended to create, and receipt does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. If you seek legal advice or representation by Hagens Berman, you must first enter a formal agreement. All information contained in any transmission is confidential and Hagens Berman agrees to protect information against unauthorized use, publication or disclosure. This site is regulated by the Washington Rules of Professional Conduct.